Left's last resort - Godwin's law:

 

The Fifth column in fourth Estate

The peddlers of Marxian Satanic verses, who only do it as an intermediate step before their ‘Dar-Ul-Islam’ can be established, the espoused cause that is not ready to be revealed, in true ‘Taqiaish’ fashion, churn out spurious and intentionally misleading fear mongering under the label of ‘scholarly’ studies in Marxian style.

Yesterday, Rana Ayyub paraded a banner for Brown Brumby, an admittedly left of center ideologist,  who according to to Rana has written an important piece.

Brown begins by concealing the guilt of UN, an organization which funds hordes of left ideologists, perhaps out of a sense of loyalty, with “United Nations Chief Ban Ki Moon said that the world would never again allow genocide to tear apart a nation. Describing it as one of the darkest chapters in human history he acknowledged that the world could have done much more to save the lives of nearly 800,000 Tutsis and politically moderate Hutus who were mass slaughtered by the extremist Hutu majority.” 

Nothing can be farther from truth. “The world did not do enough” is only a meek cover up the fact that it was UN who oversaw the genocide as a result of its passivity. Unlike the armchair Professors like Stuart J. Kaufman, I rely more on those who were on the ground, like Dallaire, Romeo, Force commander of UNAMIR, the peace keeping force of for Rwanda during the genocide. Here is what he has to say.

UN allowed it to happen. If you begin with wrong premise, as Brown Brumby has, you end up in Marxian ideology. It is the Kofi Annans and Iqbal Rizas, from the left and liberal constituency that allowed the millions of Rwandans to be killed by standing what they thought was neutral and politically correct ground. After Rwanda, UN allowed another to happen in Darfur.

I will ignore Brown Brumby’s moronic construction that “prejudice against religious minorities has now become a structural feature of Indian society” as mere mindless Marxian hubris. The Indian Constitution means nothing to these people. Marxists have a way of twisting the meaning of words in a perverse way to suit the convoluted Marxist ideology.  The number of Muslims in high places, as Presidents, Chief Justices, Businessmen do not mean anything as these truths threaten their ideology founded prejudices. Suffice it to say, that it is hubris unadulterated.

The myth of origin and ancestry

The statement that ‘majoritarian forces in India believe that Indian Christians and Muslims do not naturally belong to India” is a Sorelian myth at best, a stratagem Marxists admit resorting to, for larger cause. Not a single policy statement is ever cited is even to even attempt to substantiate this myth. Not a collection of anecdotal evidences either.

On the one hand, one cannot miss the sympathies of the author towards Christians and Muslims and that is the reason I have mentioned the ‘Taqiaish’ style, for it is where the true loyalties may be found to lie eventually.

The article reveals its ignorance of Hinduism, its concepts of ‘Vasudeva Kutumbakam’ which are in contrast to Christianity and Islam that impose a duty on its followers to urge the ‘others’ to join their fold. It fails to high light the absence of an Hindu-urge to convert the ‘others, accept people for what they are. With such glaring evidence against Christianity and Islam, as usual the culprit is Hinduism. It reeks of intellectual laziness and dishonesty at best. The only religions that segregate 'us' from 'them' are Islam and Christianity. But what has fact to do with building ideological hell with Marxian bricks?

The myth of the Golden Age:

The Marxist history is slowly getting into the dustbin with more and more contrarian and credible Indian history being told. Varnasi is touted to be one of the most ancient cities of world history. Maxmullian history is now being revealed more and more as a motivated narrative. The Aryan invasion theory, the foundation on which Marxian history of India is built on, is in trash can. These are supportive arguments to demolish the suggestion that India was never a leader in scientific and cultural areas before the invasion of the Muslim marauders.

Indians were never used to the level of violence the Muslim invaders brought into India and this can be seen in the background of Rana Pratap vs Mohammad Ghori episodes. Indians were steeped in compassion, ethics and fair play even in dealing with enemies in battle and the invaders were not. The acts of the invaders still have not turned Hindus, the natives of India into Muslims yet and the credit goes to its cultural sophistication. The debate of cultural loss to India as a result of invading barbarians is something that cannot be covered here, but to say it is an imagination of Indian Hindus is falsification of Indian history to push an agenda of one’s own. I have already declared what I think that agenda is.

The myth of suffering

To say that there was no suffering is the real myth here. While myths can be built on imagined suffering, it does not mean all sufferings are myth. Libs are never strong with logic.

If all sufferings are to be swept under the carpet of myth, the same can be said about the apartheid and holocaust too. Sufferings are historical facts, Indians suffering under the Muslim invaders are documented extensively by many Muslim chroniclers but one has to read to meet truth face to face.  To build a Sorelian myth, you do not base your words on facts, as Brown Brumpy has done here, just feed the fears of the gullible with what they want to hear.

Social and Political Exclusion

In India it is not the entire picture to see the Social and Political exclusion. Jagannathan has written on this taking in both sides, that is, the advantage Muslims enjoy as well as the disadvantages. For example, the entire South Indian retail trade is dominated by disproportionate number of Muslims so much so, they have issued fatwas in certain areas declaring the area out of bound for non-Muslims. Bottom line is, it is not as bleak as it is painted and the percentage drop may not mean drop in absolute numbers. In the case of Gujarat, the recruitments are carried out based on policies. If the policies are being bent to accommodate Hindus, I am sure there is a case. But as long as that is not the case, it is snake oil.

Development as legitimization  

Deng too played a Development card but that was not necessarily a genocide card.  Obama talks about development and who does not? Why only Gujarat Model? This is a spurious and vicious argument to forcibly fit an inappropriate analogy to support a preconceived notion. And this is yet another aspect of the article that shamelessly shows how far the peddlers of fear mongers will go to paint Hindus in India in tar black.

Mass media as tool of mobilization

If Modi, the ‘bete noir’ of media is accused of controlling the media, it is laughable. Modi acknowledged the role of SM in fighting the MSM which are belligerently against Modi. If not for the SM, BJP would not have been able to communicate to the masses in India. The medium of BJP is the most egalitarian, leveller one. Yet, since the concluding part of the prejudice is already fixed, another myth is peddled that MSM is in control of Modi. Modi refused to speak to MSM for years. Modi had to walk out of many of those antagonistic interviews by MSM. He has been vilified by all and special media houses like Tehelka, from where Rana Ayyub propagates, have been funded with mysterious sources, shell companies, running into millions of rupees. The Editors of loss making media houses live lives of Agha Khans. And all of them are under the complete control of left leaning, anti-Modi variety and yet, Brown Brumby has no shame in accusing, rather projecting her sins on to the adversary.

Rewarding Pogroms

In one sweeping statement, Brown Brumby, a rank outsider accuses our courts of being partial to Hindus with Ayyub applauding. I never said that these are not treasonous characters and this only proves my point. Those in India, except Rana Ayyub, will remember Modi’s challenge to Arnab to compare any 10 riots in India and rank Gujarat in terms of rate of conviction, time to taken to bring under control etc.

Resolution

The fangs of the writer are finally revealed in this last paragraph. “The government has to take proactive measures’ is the solution she recommends. It resonates with Zoya’s words in NDTV urging that Hindu’s voting rights be taken away if Modi is the person they want to elect. So it is not about the will of the people. It is the will of these intolerant beasts with its totalitarian, subjugating ideology that is supreme. The pretense of egalitarianism and equality are mere farces so as to realize their ambition to impose a draconian state on us; what remains to be seen is if it will be driven by their religions allegiance or ideological fanaticism.

The word ‘presstitute’ will die a sudden death if not for Ayyubs and Browns and their thriving tribe. They are here on a mission that they cannot overtly state but will parasite on the benefits of an open society till the democratic form of governance is rendered so weak, when they can signal the predatory communal masters to share the kill.

This is first of the three I plan to write, trying to expose the logical and ethical flaws in the ‘presstitute’s propaganda.  

The next on the false comparison these motivated ideologists make between Modi and Hitler and then go on to compare the idea behind this intolerance, Mein Kamf and guess what?

Leave your comments are send mail to dwimidha@gmail.com

Mother Democracy in ICU - Will she survive another Varanasi

 Democracy under attack

 

The unkindest cuts to democracy were delivered today and everyday, ever since election processes began, by a gang of traitors of democracy, like the infamous Roman Senate. The senators who owe their living, their callings, to the same fruits of democracy they parasite on. The Varanasi episode is just one of them.

Those shameful acts were not committed by enemies from outside but are very much part of the core system. But not sure if they are Indians with interest of India at heart.

The authorities who turned blind eye to Rahul’s cavalcade ploughing through the potholes of Amethi road draw salary paid by system they dug the knives in.

The Police Inspector who pretended, till he realized that his omission has been captured on Camera, that he had not seen Priyanka’s PA Preti Sahay, takes order from EC, the constitutional arm specifically empowered for fair election. He did his fair share of stab too.

As the Inspector refused to challenge Preti Sahay, even as Smriti officially asked him to do, he twisted the plunged knife for good measure.

When permission was denied to a candidate to canvas in a constituency from which he is contesting, the Returning officer drew his arsenal of sharpened and hidden blades, on democracy.
There seemed to be many knives hoarded for this very purpose to ensure that democracy is left bleeding in Varnasi, blades held in proxy for relatives and masters in power.

The first one was when he claimed that the venue requested by BJP has already been allotted to one Mr Khan much before BJP's request was received, contrary to facts.

When it was pointed out that the money paid into the treasury does not support his version, a cover up operation, in the form of an order exempting Mr Khan from depositing the money, an unusual sign of benevolence, was the next knife to descend.

When both lies failed, the Returning officer sprung was the false bogey of ‘security reason’. As Arun Jaitley said, if Returning officer is incapable of providing security, let him take a transfer, but instead the choice was to bury another knife by refusing to stand by democratic rights of the contestant.

The returning officer added insult to the injury when he claimed Ravi Srinivasan that all permissions are provided without any proof of permissions ever reaching the aggrieved.

N Ram provides the target identification for these Senators, as only betrays his congenital hatred to anyone who does not agree with him, when he provided a crutch to those murderers motive, covering them with glory. His turncoat antics already well documented, he still is addressed as an expert by procuring Media.

The SMS, especially Ravi Srinivasan provides the grinding stone that sharpens the knives, giving false alibis to the butchers of democracy.
The Chubeys, as they accuse that the problem is not with the Returning officer's step motherly treatment of BJP but due to BJP's perverse political ambition, sharpen their talon and fangs for a possible festivity of feasting on carcass of Democracy. 
----

Seemandhra went to poll with no respite to allegations of voter bribery through churches, openly reported in media and EC was playing Nero's fiddle.

What is the purpose of election if money is paid through places of worship right under the nose of EC, headed by a person who was recommended by the briber’s father? Why have this sham and facade at all?

Booths were being captured in TMC ruled West Bengal without EC batting an eye.EC staff are threatened and berated. Rahul is allowed to guide voter to press the right button. Rahul is allowed to hold a mini meeting inside the polling booth.

While BJP is being targeted for electoral violations, the rest are allowed a free run. If Modi’s action of Selfie was really objectionable, the EC could have asked an FIR to be filed after an investigation instead of demanding FIR be filed before 6 PM because of what EC surmised from the ‘tone and tenor’. But the path EC chose betrayed does not rule out a possible bias on the part of those who were supposed to run a fair election.

If Ramdev’s word could be perversely twisted with nuanced translation , who can explain EC's silence when TMC candidate set a price of 1 Crores on the head of Ramdev?

Why was TMC allowed to blatantly call out that not a single ‘Bangladeshis’ will be allowed to be sent back, in total contravention of the Supreme Court order? What happened to Congress posters with Temples in the background? TMC posters with unconcealed appeal to Muslims? Jagan fearlessly using the pulpit for votes?

----
With so many out there to kill and maim democracy, stealing from the wealth that democracy bestows, who does not differentiate amongst who benefits from her benevolence, it is still a wonder that after 60 years of murderous assault, she still continues to show signs of life.

May 16^th is the last chance for getting Mother democracy back on her feet and to nurture it to her good health. The free run the jackals have been having has gone on for too long. All institutions of democracy have been successfully infiltrated and compromised by political interest through pliant appointees who have sold Mother India for a morsel. The politician-babu nexus based on favors, connections, caste, blood relationships have wreaked havoc to her health. The blades of traitors in the vestige of Senators have bled her to the verge of death. The eyes of fairness have been gorged by partisan communal elements ruling us for longest time.

Yet, come 16th of May 2014, resurrect she will. There are still enough Indians determined to lead Mother India to a glorious future. 16th is neigh, it will take us to demise of the pickers of morsels. You can run but you cannot hide after 16th May.

Was Rajiv really a Martyr?

 

Priyanka Vadra barged into political scene to stem the sagging fortunes of Congress that could no longer be hidden and perhaps also because someone within Congress mustered enough courage to carry the bad news to high command. She came with an express intent to canvas for her brother and mother. No one asked her “what about political conviction’?

The moment she announced her entry, as if on a cue, the big TV channels, got stuck to her as parasites and tormented the otherwise uninterested viewer with visuals of this gawky woman balancing on pile of bricks.   

P Vadra is a known phenomenon that surfaces up the electoral waters only during campaign seasons. She is also not known for her statements that will stir thinking person’s gray matter either. But NDTV’s Barkha Dutt averred that Priyanka is the leader of 2019, based on what political achievement of Priyanka, only Barkha Dutt is privy to. However, SM credits Barkha of being not only in the know of secretive deals and also of taking active fixing roles. So one will have to trust her on this.

It is still a wonder how the Times camera team managed to balance themselves over their own drool as they gave uninterrupted coverage to her. But it must be said that all English channels, including CNN-IBN followed P Vadra picking up the gems of political wisdom as and when she deigned to drop one. 

These Channels’, a.k.a ‘Media Traders’ infatuation and awe of the dynasty can be explained by years of taking alms and the slavery ingrained in their genes.  Nothing else can explain the disproportionate coverage given to P Vadra by all and the sundry. Her resemblance to her grandmother was one of the strongest political statements the ‘Mediatraders’ carried without any shame.

As political assertions, P Vadra’s statements can be reduced the following

1.       BJP scurries like rats

2.       I am Rajiv’s daughter

3.       Smriti who?

4.       My father died for the country. My father was martyred.

Obviously there is a large and famous wounded game in the political forest and the predators are prowling.  The smell of blood is wafting across the Amethi’s electoral woods. Smriti has nothing to lose and Rahul everything.  The Gandhi family has been drawing the political dividend from Amethi’s emotional capital but a new generation may spring surprise.

In this context, we also saw in Modi’s Amethi meeting, BJP not ‘scurrying as rats’, but growling. Modi laid the hollowness of such ill-conceived words of P Vadra bare by tearing into Gandhi’s family that, licking his wounds, Salman Kurshid had to say that ‘BJP should have shown some courtesy by not campaigning in Amethi. The crowd in Amethi was unprecedentedly large; one may not know if Smriti would emerge winner, but the common agreement is that surely she is putting up a worthy fight. The margin of win, if Rahul wins at all, is going to be greatly reduced. Win is not out of reach now for BJP and so much meat in P Vadra’s claim that BJP ‘scurries as rats’. They were at your backyard, snarling, and there was no one to shoo them away!

Modi stole ‘Priyanka is a daughter’ debate not by word play, but on the strength of honesty and truth. The MSM painted a crude picture of Modi, aided by the State’s channel editing critical parts of the interview under instruction of motor-mouth Minister. And P Vadra, as usual made crass, crude and disrespectful comments and finally stood alone, with mud on her face. Shame did not deter her, it appears.

Perhaps P Vadra thought of herself as Indian ‘Dorothy Parker’ when she attempted to belittle Smriti asking ‘Smriti who’? That jibe was mean and hypocritical, because as proxy, P Vadra was in Amethi defending their family turf against the very same 'Smriti who' that was getting more and more encroached upon by the political rivals, mainly BJP. Smriti was wearing her shoes off, traveling the width and breadth of Amethi constituency, dignity personified. P Vadra made a mistake of her life when she attempted to insult Smriti, calling her inconsequential.

And it has stung BJP and as a result BJP has gone for the kill today as Modi spared none from the Congress dynasty.   It has added to BJP’s determination to bare its fangs, bare its fangs it did and with what style?

I have no quarrels if P Vadra says her father was murdered. But if she calls Rajiv Gandhi a martyr, it is claiming more credit than Rajiv is due. Rajiv was killed by Sri Lanka based Tamil Tigers, a fact that has been proven beyond doubt. The cause of that was, the enmity sworn by Prabhakaran as he thought he was double crossed by Rajiv.

First of all, the seeds of discord between Sri Lanka and India were co-sowed by Indira Gandhi when she authorized training of Sri Lankan terrorists in Indian soil. She fed the monster that killed Rajiv. I am definitely not saying she was responsible for Rajiv’s death but was the one who set the dice rolling, unaware that it will one day kill her only surviving son.

When Prabhakaran was in Delhi, the grapevine is, ill-advised by people he trusted, Rajiv put Prabhakaran under house arrest to get the latter to sign the Peace accord.

Another theory, found here http://ibnlive.in.com/news/secret-of-rajivprabhakaran-meet/14464-3-1.html , says that Rajiv reneged on an agreement that was signed based on consideration of questionable origin and one that resulted in Prabhakaran avenging by ordering Rajiv’s threat.

How do you fit in the ‘martyr’ piece in this scandalous, dishonorable story? Rajiv did a lot of good, had good intentions, though he patronized his wife’s friends who collected commission on his behalf. He stirred the Telecom revolution in India, backed Pitroda to the hilt are all OK, but to claim he died a martyr is selling political snake oil. Rajiv died because he double crossed, notwithstanding the fact, the person double crossed was no Dharmputra. But he double crossed and paid for his amateurish antics in politics, a game sublime minds find hard to play well. He died in a turf war he picked with a nefarious character he elected to deal with.

So let us be done with this balderdash of thrusting martyrdom on Rajiv. The fact he died the way he did, in the hands of terrorists in Indian soil is really sad and deplorable. But that does not make him a martyr.

****

Media is replete with reports linking DMK and Rajiv, going as far as claiming that it was DMK ideology that inspired the killing of Rajiv. The Jain commission has this to say.

“The Jain Commission has said the encouragement given by the DMK, while it was in power, to the LTTE, ultimately enabled the LTTE to assassinate Rajiv Gandhi.” (see http://m.rediff.com/news/dec/03cho.htm )

And it was the same DMK that Congress allied with, led by Sonia Gandhi, the widow of Rajiv Gandhi, who S Vadra claims incorrectly as being martyred. If S Vadra is so upset with her father’s death, that sometimes she sees non-existent martyrdom in it, why is she not upset with her mother for joining hands with people accused to have had a hand in the killing of her father? Bewildering, is it not?

However, finding Congress in bed with people having aided her father’s death does not bother her as much as Modi saying that Gandhis did not pay attention to the progress of Amethi. P Vadra says that people of Amethi will not forgive Modi for his utterances. But is it not a wonder that Amethi forgave Congress for allying with political parties accused of aiding Rajiv’s killing?

I would conclude, she finds the political opponents more disagreeable to the killers of her father.  Something is wrong with priorities. What is it?

At the end of the day, the pretense is over protecting the ill-gotten wealth in friendly Congress ruled states buying and selling land. It is over the special privileges accorded to the dynasty. It is the ‘let them eat cake’ attitude of the Antoinette that will spell political doom for the dynasty. It is the privileges enjoyed without earning any of it. It is living the life of a feudal lord in a democratic country. It is the benefit the family derives from the gullibility of electorate wastefully preferring to be associated with VIP constituency over economics. It is never having known the sweat of toil. It is never having lived as Indian. It is the sum of all this arrogance.

dwimidha@gmail.com