First Brown Then Red

Mass murders in History

One Mr Devu Chodanka is trying to escape from the clutches of Goa Police for posting ‘holocaust’ comment in FB. He allegedly posted, if Modi comes to power, there would be systematic elimination of minorities. This police action is based on the ignoble Section 66A of IT Act, brainchild of sycophantic Congress luminaries, created to protect their overlords from a possible exposure to truth. Such Control on thought seem a blue blooded Fascist act, that originated from Congress and had the support of the Left liberals who called it "reasonable restrictions" a moving goal post that suits their ideology.

Then there are many academicians imbibed with western inculcated values, who feel somewhat cheated because though they are well equipped with the liberal anti-Fascist, anti-Nazi vocabulary, there is hardly any opportunity available to them in India to put their skills to use. In these days of dearth of Fascist leaders, these intellectuals invent one in right wing politicians, just as their western Liberal leaders do. Here lies the irony. With no Right wing mass murderer like Hitler on the Right wing, what do they do? They commit verbicide, change the meaning of words to suit their political ideology. This post is about that perversion of meaning.  

In Indian politics, there are two types of political ideologies that compete for mandate to rule; both are left leaning ideologies. The only difference being the degree of leaning. We have on the left extreme, the ideologically orthodox, bloody Naxals and the towards the right extreme of the left ideologies, we have BJP. Every time I hear people describing BJP as ‘right of center’ party, I try not to bust my innards laughing.   How else do you call a party that comes to power by their subsidy programs that do not stir a man to go out to work? The BJP programs that make direct payment to the weak and needy will put socialist ruled states to shame, the essential difference being, BJP has successfully improved the quality of delivery by reducing waste and corruption.   That could possibly be a critical reason why BJP Governments are being re-elected. 

BJP follows such policies so as not to be relegated to irrelevance in Indian political scenario where votes have always been shared between left, pampering and appeasing parties, who present various Marxian hued ideals as political objectives; that easily appeal to the voters and also make the politician’s job less risky. While I agree that BJP is not center to right party, I also concede that, it is where BJP wants to be and to be there, it has to start where it has started. Modi has shown a center to right dream to the public and their resounding reply has been in the affirmative. Thus BJP has created a chance to be the first right of center party in India, but are not there yet. And Modi’s personalized leadership also paves way for BJP to break from the socialist mould.

Then there are those leaders from various other political parties, all of their calling card describing them as socialists, though of varying color, yet finally sharing a common DNA strand with Karl Marx, who truly believe that their duty to their cause is not complete without a mandatory comparison of Modi/ RSS/BJP with Hitler/Fascists/Nazis with predictable periodicity. Congress, SP, JDU, RJD, CPI-M, CPI, CPI-ML, CPI-M&L, CPI-M~L, what the heck, all the collection of bastardized revisionist Marxists, all of them stand for ‘social justice’, ‘Secularism’, equality and other democratic principles that were exemplified during Stalinist Russia. I am just trying to help you visualize the team. On the one hand, we have Socialists of all hues and on the other BJP, which again appears like another socialist party.  

So we have the teams well defined. In this division, those in the Left accuse the Right, whether it is the Liberals of the US or Left & Liberals of India, of being Fascists and Nazis. While the American Left paints all the rest as ‘racists’ and shame them out of debate, Indian Left and liberals use “communal” and  add-on accusations like Fascists and Hitler for good measure. Is Marxism, mother of Socialism, contrastingly different from Fascism and Nazism and did Right politics spring forth from the Fascist and Nazi wellspring? 

Nazi stands for ‘National Socialism’, mind you, not ‘National Capitalism’, socialism as in Lenin’s idea. While the world was boiling with the socialistic heating started by Soviet, its appeal being the international collaboration of Labor, there was no respectable opposition from Capitalism. 

While the Russian brand of socialism was attempting to forge an alliance at International level, Hitler, steeped in his hatred for Jews attempted to forge at Socialism at national level, further distilled through the racial classification. But they all were socialists. Sibling rivalry for the same piece of heirloom between Nazis and Communists does not make the two unrelated by blood.

The socialists argue that since Hitler started arresting Socialists and Communists, he was not a socialist. However, Hitler and Socialists were fighting for the same constituency, workers Union, and Hitler upped the ante with a strong Nationalistic fervor which won him the mandate. The workers chose a national variety of Socialism over International one. The Socialists of Germany recognized it by their slogan, ‘First Brown, then Red”, indicating that the Nazis, when they evolve will turn Socialists.

However, after knowing the outcome of history, the logic Socialists employ is “Capitalists are anti-Socialists. Hitler was anti-Socialist. Hence Hitler was Capitalist (right wing) and on this fallacy the world is being fed incessantly the Left propaganda that Hitler was a Capitalist right winger. 

Hitler lent evil aspects to his version of Socialism by adding racial hatred, anti-Semitism and genocidal hunger by projecting Jews as personified enemy. Hitler held Jews to be the reason for the misfortunes of Germans and in that aspect also, his views were similar to Marx, who was a Jew hating Jew.

Let us also see who else eliminated a section of their own country men by demonizing them. 

During the Red Terror of Lenin’s time, tens of thousands (Cossacks) perished and Lenin was a Socialist.

It wasStalin who killed around few Millions, also Socialist. Not Capitalist right winger. Of course, it was mere statistics to him, in a de-personified assessment of political cleansing.

Mao, another Socialist leader knocked off another 3~4 million and topped it with the massacres of people of Tibet.

Khmer Rouge, another Communist from Cambodia killed about 2 million out of a total population of 7 million

Further, those rogues like Che Guera, who famously said “if in doubt, kill him” is made to be a revolutionary. This is the kind of intellectual laziness that pervades Left ideology as with religious Supremacism, that peace is achievable after dissenting voices are eliminated. 

It is also to be noted that Monarch Fidel Castro, who anointed his brother as leader of Cuba, who has not let a whiff of democracy enter Cuba, is still the adored Communist socialist revolutionary to the Left. And all these Left organizations do not fail to carry a ‘democratic’ tag to their name, in their Sorelian spirit of lying through their teeth.

Other Socialist led killings have taken place in Vietnam, Romania, North Korea, Hungary all have had their share of killing those who held another view or accused of. Socialists are ones who glorify killing humans, justify it as legitimate political activity. Can one forget the twist the Marxist gave to the slaughter, rape and forced conversion of tens of thousands of Hindus in Kerala as one of revolution? It is the same DNA strand that is shared by Hitler and any self-respecting Socialist, to demonize section of humans as enemies and justify killing in cold blood. 

While Rwandan genocide was horrific, overseen by inept UN which could have avoided the death toll of this magnitude, the world also witnessed, though mutely, another genocidal horror at Darfur, with over 400000 dead and about 3 million displaced. It had nothing to do with Capitalism but with the regressive tribal/ racial feud, the latter had additionally religious Supremacy. One can stretch that tribal feud itself is the foul smell of Capitalism as Left would do but for that you will have to water-board truth, which the Left is capable of doing as a matter of course.

Iraq war with casualty of about 200000 dead, perpetrated by religious Right wing Bush, hogged the limelight while the millions in Darfur died, sometimes at the rate of 10000 per month. Darfur was a Muslims killing Muslims variety of genocide which had all classical Nazi elements. Yet, the attention it drew was insignificant in comparison to the Iraq war, because the Left liberals do not consider it of good propaganda value and it does not fit in their overall ‘socialist story’ and let it be.

In the last 8 to 9 decades the mass killing of people was carried out almost exclusively by Left ideology or by religious Supremacists. But these are the two groups who ceaselessly allege right wing of pogrom and genocide.

In this light, the current roll call of the Left and liberal leadership and Muslim voices alleging RSS and BJP to be the next Nazi party and Hitler is just continuation of their old trick.

If any political ideology has dehumanized one’s own people, made enemies of a section of one’s own countrymen, intellectualized the spin into political hate with nice sounding words, such ideology has always come from the Left constituency. As a concerted diversionary tactic (to borrow another word from Marxian Lexicon) they point their fingers at political right as culprits while turning blind to the millions and millions scorched by the Marxian, Left ideologies all over the world.

We in India need not be perturbed if the Left liberals keep up their fear mongering that Modi will be the next Hitler. It is those Left who uphold an ideology as final truth who will resort to violence and never a Hindu for whom the truth is ever changing.  Fundamentally, Hindus have been non-violent as a result of their philosophy (not because of cowardice) and are truly secular due to the concept of ‘Vasudeva Kudumbakam’ ingrained in Hindu psyche. When the Godless Left and Supremacist religionists accuse Modi, it always pays to pause and reflect on the objectives of these groups, i.e., domination of the world with their violent ideology. Let us ever remind ourselves who the real left overs of Hitler are. It is always the side Left takes.  

#Mission 2019 "Congress Mukht Bharat"

#Mission2019 – ‘Congress Mukht Bharat’

There are many who thrive by repeating clichés, yet call themselves political pundits because they repeat better or are better connected than others or both. Till day before yesterday,  from the days of coalition politics, the pundits never tired themselves of telling the plebs that the days of coalition politics is here to stay for good.  And surprise, surprise, the same pundits tell us now that the coalition politics is over for India. If not for these precious gems of wisdom from the ‘intelligentsia’ we, the rest of Indians would be thrown back to the dark ages of barbarism and anarchy.

While such inanities continue to be sold to us, the truth shall march silently, paying no attention to the simians lost in self-amusement.

From today, a section of political pundits have deigned to tell us that ‘Congress will bounce back’.  There is no basis for such a claim except that it cannot be disproved ever. I shudder every time I think of these pundits, living life of danger and peril.

The stated and repeated objective of Modiji undoubtedly has been ‘Congress Mukht Bharat’ and there is no reason to believe that he does not mean it any more nor is any to believe that the objective is bound to be diluted in future days. And I am sure that BJP has laid out plans to ensure that the next election will ensure that India continues to be ‘mukht’ of Congress.

 ‘Congress Mukht Bharat’ is one of the attractive appeals to many voters, motivation for voting BJP to power; even if it was not the only reason, at least one of the delectable possibilities that seems to have united all of the voters. And for this reason, the victory in 2014 is a challenging one to BJP as this goal post is not something that can be reached so that it can be declared that the objective is reached. It is more like removing cancer cells to begin a healthy life, yet hold the fear of the dreadful days returning surreptitiously, when no one notices.

One of the toughest challenges that can turn into a possible failure of BJP in 2019 could be dissatisfaction arising out of the expectations of people not being met, though not for want of trying by BJP but because of the stupendous expectation hanging in the air. And each of those failed expectations is bound to fail a section of people who have voted Modiji. Too many failed expectation will allow the ‘Congress Mukht Bharat’ to resurrect, an outcome no one wants, except the dregs of the British who managed to rule India till today, for most part of the time at least.

There are many promises that have been made on ‘progress’ and ‘development’ front which, only time will tell if BJP could deliver on them. Having seen Modi’s speech at Kaashi, I suspect the blue print is ready in the backroom.

On the other hand, in its clamor for progress and development, will BJP take the forgiving approach and provide passive exoneration in the following cases? I am leaving out the ones that are already visible (as a tip of an iceberg) like 2G, Coal scam but only focus on the under reported with great opportunity.

Bringing these cases to a logical end will improve the chances of seeing 2019 as year of “Congress Mukht Bharat’. It will also send a message to the criminals that the days of ‘maaf’ are over and they will have to pay the price for their sins. Prevention of crime and conviction of culprits, both are necessary to reduce crime and if one of them is weak, crime will thrive. Here is my list to start with. This is not witch hunt, but bringing justice back to Indian political domain.

·         PSU Board appointment: This is an investigation that will go up to Damad and is one sure nail in Congress’ coffin.

·         Hasan Ali: Will spill the names of the high and mighty in Congress for whom he peddled in Hawala.

·         Siachan: An inquiry into Sonia’s involvement in Government’s secret attempt to give Siachen, the people in the Army who sat with Sonia and team to draft the plan will show what kind of anti-nationals Congress has been

·         Cash for Vote: Role of Congress in threatening media into submission which led to innocents being punished which allowed Congress to be in power through illegal means.

·         Counterfeit notes and connection to Politicians in UP/Kashmir

·         Naval Accidents, failure

·         VK Singh DOB

·         Diverting Cong fund for News paper shares/ National Herald take over by Rahul

·         Air India

·         Augusta

·         Smuggling antiques

·         Drug Mafia

·         Vadra Land scam

·         Sunanda Tharoor

·         Media management

·         Appointment of Minorities

·         Bangla Migration

·         Burmese Muslim Migration to India

·         Sonia's medical bill

·         Support toTeesta

·         Sreekumar support (Including the ISRO case) ·         Zoya’s statement to disenfranchise Hindus in India -     Deliver Non-Bailable arrest warrant to Imam Bukhari, show State is no wimp

If you have any more to be remembered, add it as comment or send a mail to dwimidha@gmail.com and I will keep this page updated to remind ourselves the list of items that needs to be pursued to ensure #Mission 2019, “Congress Mukht Bharat”

Any suggestion?

Left's last resort - Godwin's law:

 

The Fifth column in fourth Estate

The peddlers of Marxian Satanic verses, who only do it as an intermediate step before their ‘Dar-Ul-Islam’ can be established, the espoused cause that is not ready to be revealed, in true ‘Taqiaish’ fashion, churn out spurious and intentionally misleading fear mongering under the label of ‘scholarly’ studies in Marxian style.

Yesterday, Rana Ayyub paraded a banner for Brown Brumby, an admittedly left of center ideologist,  who according to to Rana has written an important piece.

Brown begins by concealing the guilt of UN, an organization which funds hordes of left ideologists, perhaps out of a sense of loyalty, with “United Nations Chief Ban Ki Moon said that the world would never again allow genocide to tear apart a nation. Describing it as one of the darkest chapters in human history he acknowledged that the world could have done much more to save the lives of nearly 800,000 Tutsis and politically moderate Hutus who were mass slaughtered by the extremist Hutu majority.” 

Nothing can be farther from truth. “The world did not do enough” is only a meek cover up the fact that it was UN who oversaw the genocide as a result of its passivity. Unlike the armchair Professors like Stuart J. Kaufman, I rely more on those who were on the ground, like Dallaire, Romeo, Force commander of UNAMIR, the peace keeping force of for Rwanda during the genocide. Here is what he has to say.

UN allowed it to happen. If you begin with wrong premise, as Brown Brumby has, you end up in Marxian ideology. It is the Kofi Annans and Iqbal Rizas, from the left and liberal constituency that allowed the millions of Rwandans to be killed by standing what they thought was neutral and politically correct ground. After Rwanda, UN allowed another to happen in Darfur.

I will ignore Brown Brumby’s moronic construction that “prejudice against religious minorities has now become a structural feature of Indian society” as mere mindless Marxian hubris. The Indian Constitution means nothing to these people. Marxists have a way of twisting the meaning of words in a perverse way to suit the convoluted Marxist ideology.  The number of Muslims in high places, as Presidents, Chief Justices, Businessmen do not mean anything as these truths threaten their ideology founded prejudices. Suffice it to say, that it is hubris unadulterated.

The myth of origin and ancestry

The statement that ‘majoritarian forces in India believe that Indian Christians and Muslims do not naturally belong to India” is a Sorelian myth at best, a stratagem Marxists admit resorting to, for larger cause. Not a single policy statement is ever cited is even to even attempt to substantiate this myth. Not a collection of anecdotal evidences either.

On the one hand, one cannot miss the sympathies of the author towards Christians and Muslims and that is the reason I have mentioned the ‘Taqiaish’ style, for it is where the true loyalties may be found to lie eventually.

The article reveals its ignorance of Hinduism, its concepts of ‘Vasudeva Kutumbakam’ which are in contrast to Christianity and Islam that impose a duty on its followers to urge the ‘others’ to join their fold. It fails to high light the absence of an Hindu-urge to convert the ‘others, accept people for what they are. With such glaring evidence against Christianity and Islam, as usual the culprit is Hinduism. It reeks of intellectual laziness and dishonesty at best. The only religions that segregate 'us' from 'them' are Islam and Christianity. But what has fact to do with building ideological hell with Marxian bricks?

The myth of the Golden Age:

The Marxist history is slowly getting into the dustbin with more and more contrarian and credible Indian history being told. Varnasi is touted to be one of the most ancient cities of world history. Maxmullian history is now being revealed more and more as a motivated narrative. The Aryan invasion theory, the foundation on which Marxian history of India is built on, is in trash can. These are supportive arguments to demolish the suggestion that India was never a leader in scientific and cultural areas before the invasion of the Muslim marauders.

Indians were never used to the level of violence the Muslim invaders brought into India and this can be seen in the background of Rana Pratap vs Mohammad Ghori episodes. Indians were steeped in compassion, ethics and fair play even in dealing with enemies in battle and the invaders were not. The acts of the invaders still have not turned Hindus, the natives of India into Muslims yet and the credit goes to its cultural sophistication. The debate of cultural loss to India as a result of invading barbarians is something that cannot be covered here, but to say it is an imagination of Indian Hindus is falsification of Indian history to push an agenda of one’s own. I have already declared what I think that agenda is.

The myth of suffering

To say that there was no suffering is the real myth here. While myths can be built on imagined suffering, it does not mean all sufferings are myth. Libs are never strong with logic.

If all sufferings are to be swept under the carpet of myth, the same can be said about the apartheid and holocaust too. Sufferings are historical facts, Indians suffering under the Muslim invaders are documented extensively by many Muslim chroniclers but one has to read to meet truth face to face.  To build a Sorelian myth, you do not base your words on facts, as Brown Brumpy has done here, just feed the fears of the gullible with what they want to hear.

Social and Political Exclusion

In India it is not the entire picture to see the Social and Political exclusion. Jagannathan has written on this taking in both sides, that is, the advantage Muslims enjoy as well as the disadvantages. For example, the entire South Indian retail trade is dominated by disproportionate number of Muslims so much so, they have issued fatwas in certain areas declaring the area out of bound for non-Muslims. Bottom line is, it is not as bleak as it is painted and the percentage drop may not mean drop in absolute numbers. In the case of Gujarat, the recruitments are carried out based on policies. If the policies are being bent to accommodate Hindus, I am sure there is a case. But as long as that is not the case, it is snake oil.

Development as legitimization  

Deng too played a Development card but that was not necessarily a genocide card.  Obama talks about development and who does not? Why only Gujarat Model? This is a spurious and vicious argument to forcibly fit an inappropriate analogy to support a preconceived notion. And this is yet another aspect of the article that shamelessly shows how far the peddlers of fear mongers will go to paint Hindus in India in tar black.

Mass media as tool of mobilization

If Modi, the ‘bete noir’ of media is accused of controlling the media, it is laughable. Modi acknowledged the role of SM in fighting the MSM which are belligerently against Modi. If not for the SM, BJP would not have been able to communicate to the masses in India. The medium of BJP is the most egalitarian, leveller one. Yet, since the concluding part of the prejudice is already fixed, another myth is peddled that MSM is in control of Modi. Modi refused to speak to MSM for years. Modi had to walk out of many of those antagonistic interviews by MSM. He has been vilified by all and special media houses like Tehelka, from where Rana Ayyub propagates, have been funded with mysterious sources, shell companies, running into millions of rupees. The Editors of loss making media houses live lives of Agha Khans. And all of them are under the complete control of left leaning, anti-Modi variety and yet, Brown Brumby has no shame in accusing, rather projecting her sins on to the adversary.

Rewarding Pogroms

In one sweeping statement, Brown Brumby, a rank outsider accuses our courts of being partial to Hindus with Ayyub applauding. I never said that these are not treasonous characters and this only proves my point. Those in India, except Rana Ayyub, will remember Modi’s challenge to Arnab to compare any 10 riots in India and rank Gujarat in terms of rate of conviction, time to taken to bring under control etc.

Resolution

The fangs of the writer are finally revealed in this last paragraph. “The government has to take proactive measures’ is the solution she recommends. It resonates with Zoya’s words in NDTV urging that Hindu’s voting rights be taken away if Modi is the person they want to elect. So it is not about the will of the people. It is the will of these intolerant beasts with its totalitarian, subjugating ideology that is supreme. The pretense of egalitarianism and equality are mere farces so as to realize their ambition to impose a draconian state on us; what remains to be seen is if it will be driven by their religions allegiance or ideological fanaticism.

The word ‘presstitute’ will die a sudden death if not for Ayyubs and Browns and their thriving tribe. They are here on a mission that they cannot overtly state but will parasite on the benefits of an open society till the democratic form of governance is rendered so weak, when they can signal the predatory communal masters to share the kill.

This is first of the three I plan to write, trying to expose the logical and ethical flaws in the ‘presstitute’s propaganda.  

The next on the false comparison these motivated ideologists make between Modi and Hitler and then go on to compare the idea behind this intolerance, Mein Kamf and guess what?

Leave your comments are send mail to dwimidha@gmail.com